GWork vs. Cascade: What’s the Difference?
Cascade is one of the most popular strategy execution platforms on the market, with over 235 reviews on G2. If you’re comparing it with GWork, you’re probably trying to figure out what you actually need to close the gap between strategy and results.
What Cascade Does Well
Cascade is a strategy planning and tracking platform. It gives leadership teams a single place to define strategic plans, track initiatives, and see progress across the organization. The dashboards are genuinely useful for executive visibility, and the product has matured significantly over the past few years.
Core features:
- Strategic plan creation with cascading goals and initiatives
- OKR and KPI tracking dashboards with portfolio views
- Scenario planning and strategy mapping
- Team alignment and progress visualization across departments
- Integrations with Jira, Salesforce, HubSpot, and data connectors
- AI-powered strategy insights
Pricing: Free tier available for basic use. Essentials and Enterprise+ plans with custom pricing.
What users like: The visual strategy maps and cascading goal views are the standout feature. Leadership teams can see how initiatives connect across the organization. The free tier is generous enough to evaluate properly. Customer support gets consistently high marks.
Common complaints: Complexity can be a barrier for teams that just need simple tracking. Some users report it’s “too sophisticated for our needs.” Limited language support for global organizations. Printed report functionality is basic. The platform is powerful at the planning layer, but users note it doesn’t address what happens after the plan is set.
What GWork Does
GWork focuses on a different part of the problem. Not “what is our strategy and is it on track?” but “why isn’t our strategy showing up in how people actually work?”
Where Cascade gives you a top-down view of strategic alignment, GWork operates bottom-up at the daily workflow level. It identifies the specific behaviors that need to change for a strategy to succeed, then reinforces those behaviors inside the tools employees already use.
The Core Difference
Cascade is a system of record for strategy. It gives you clarity, alignment, and visibility from the top down.
GWork is a system of action. It changes what happens on the ground floor, from the bottom up.
| Cascade | GWork | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Strategy planning and tracking | Strategic implementation |
| View | Top-down (leadership visibility) | Bottom-up (frontline behavior) |
| Cadence | Monthly/quarterly strategy reviews | Daily reinforcement in the flow of work |
| Measures | Initiative progress, KPI movement | Whether daily behavior actually changed |
| Data model | Reported progress against strategic plans | Observed behavior patterns in real workflows |
| Buyer | Strategy team, CEO, COO | Org Effectiveness, COO, CHRO |
| Best when | You need strategic clarity and portfolio visibility | Strategy is clear but implementation keeps stalling |
A Concrete Example
Say your board approves a strategic initiative: “Reduce time-to-market by 30% across all product lines.”
With Cascade: The strategy team maps this into sub-initiatives per product line, assigns owners, sets KPIs, tracks milestones. Leadership can see a beautiful strategy map showing how everything connects. Quarterly reviews show progress. But the product teams are still running the same approval workflows and handoff processes as before.
With GWork: You identify the 4 daily behaviors that slow down time-to-market (like routing decisions through 3 approval layers instead of 1). GWork reinforces the new, faster behaviors directly in how teams work every day. Within 30 days, you see which product teams have actually changed their process and which are still stuck in the old flow.
Cascade shows you the roadmap. GWork shows you whether people are actually driving on it.
When to Choose Cascade
- Your org doesn’t have a clear, centralized view of the strategy
- Multiple teams are working on strategic initiatives without coordination
- Leadership needs better dashboards and portfolio views to track progress
- You’re managing a portfolio of 10+ strategic initiatives across departments
- You need scenario planning and strategy mapping capabilities
When to Choose GWork
- The strategy is clear and well-communicated, but implementation keeps stalling
- Dashboards show progress but daily operations haven’t actually changed
- You’ve invested in planning tools and still can’t close the execution gap
- The breakdown happens between strategy definition and frontline behavior
- You need proof that behavior changed, not just that progress was reported
Can You Use Both?
They’re a natural pair. Cascade tells you what the strategy is and tracks progress at the initiative level. GWork makes sure those initiatives translate into changed behavior at the daily level.
Think of it like having both a GPS (Cascade: where are we going and what’s the best route?) and a driving instructor (GWork: are you actually making the right turns every day?). The GPS doesn’t help if the driver keeps taking the old route out of habit.
For more on why this gap persists, we explore the difference between tracking engagement and actually measuring behavior.
Try GWork
90-day pilot. One strategic priority. One team. Measurable behavior change within 30 days.
About the Author
Oran Cohen is the founder of GWork, where he’s building strategic implementation technology for enterprises. He’s spent 8 years studying why organizational strategy fails to translate into daily operations, working with organizations including WHO, UNICEF, Sappi, and Nestle.
Related Reading
- GWork vs Quantive: Strategy Execution Compared
- GWork vs Betterworks
- Viva Goals Alternative
- What Causes the Strategy Execution Gap?
Ready to close the strategy-execution gap?